On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Mitchell Hashimoto wrote:
>> Resurrecting this because I realized I never got a response here. What is
>> the status of this patch? Was there some issue somewhere I was supposed to
>> be looking at?
> I read the question roughly like this:
> Why does this function take an existing channel and use it, rather than
> creating a completely new channel in the same style many other functions
> Is there a particular benefit from using an existing channel rather than to
> creating a new one?
Ah got it, I'll take a look again, sorry about that.
> I haven't read up the specs on this thing, but after you've sent this auth
> agent request over the channel, is there a limitation to how this channel is
> to be used or what is the application supposed to do (or not to do) with the
> channel after a successful return?
There is no limitation at all. The channel is still fully functional.
> / daniel.haxx.se
> libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2012-04-07