Subject: Re: NULL after *_free?

Re: NULL after *_free?

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:19:35 +0100 (CET)

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010, Peter Stuge wrote:

> I'm not strongly opposed to it but I do think the library should be as thin
> as possible, so I do prefer not to add it.

I agree. And we have tools like custom mallocs or valgrind to track memory
errors that referring to already freed memory would cause.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2010-02-11