Subject: Re: comparing with libssh

Re: comparing with libssh

From: Simon Josefsson <simon_at_josefsson.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:29:11 +0200

Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se> writes:

> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>
>> This said, I even failed to build this on Linux... I was tempted to do a
>> speed comparison but I'll put that on hold for now.
>
> libssh2 test:
>
> $ ./scp_nonblock 127.0.0.1 [user] [password] [big file] >/dev/null
>
> 693M bytes file took 21.89 seconds. Speed: 31.6MB/sec
>
> libssh test:
>
> $ ./samplessh [user]@localhost "cat [big file]" >/dev/null
>
> 693M bytes file took 50.96 seconds. Speed: 13.6MB/sec
>
> All further comments unnecessary. ;-)

I'm curious if there is any difference in encryption/MAC algorithm
choice between these libraries?

/Simon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel
Received on 2009-06-13