RE : RE : For the interested ones : libssh2_userauth_publickey_fromfileandlibssh2_userauth_hostbased_fromfile with no need of thepublickey file

You're right; I forgot to deal with GnuTLS. This is because I always use OpenSSL...

However, I'm not sure it's a good idea to implement functionality for one cryptographic library and not for another because it's then hard for a client user to know whether he can rely or not on a particular feature.

BTW, why would it be so difficult to implement for GnuTLS?

JLC

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Mikhail Gusarov [mailto:dottedmag_at_dottedmag.net]
Envoyé : vendredi 27 mars 2009 12:25
À : libssh2 development
Objet : Re: RE : For the interested ones : libssh2_userauth_publickey_fromfileandlibssh2_userauth_hostbased_fromfile with no need of thepublickey file

Twas brillig at 12:15:51 27.03.2009 UTC+01 when Jean-Louis.CHARTON_at_oikialog.com did gyre and gimble:

JC> + p_bytes = BN_num_bytes(dsa->p) + 1;
JC> + q_bytes = BN_num_bytes(dsa->q) + 1;
JC> + g_bytes = BN_num_bytes(dsa->g) + 1;
JC> + k_bytes = BN_num_bytes(dsa->pub_key) + 1;

Seems that the patch works only with OpenSSL. Can you make it compiling
with GnuTLS too? IIRC there is no way to easily do the same, so it can
just "return -1" in this case.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel mailing list
libssh2-devel_at_lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libssh2-devel