Re: [PATCH] libssh2_channel_request_auth_agent

On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Mitchell Hashimoto wrote:

> Resurrecting this because I realized I never got a response here. What is
> the status of this patch? Was there some issue somewhere I was supposed to
> be looking at?

I read the question roughly like this:

   Why does this function take an existing channel and use it, rather than
   creating a completely new channel in the same style many other functions
   work?

Is there a particular benefit from using an existing channel rather than to
creating a new one?

I haven't read up the specs on this thing, but after you've sent this auth
agent request over the channel, is there a limitation to how this channel is
to be used or what is the application supposed to do (or not to do) with the
channel after a successful return?

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
_______________________________________________
libssh2-devel http://cool.haxx.se/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libssh2-devel